<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alliance of Reston Clusters and Homeowners Meeting on 7/7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goreston.com/reston-news/reston-association-news/alliance-of-reston-clusters-and-homeowners-meeting-on-77/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goreston.com/reston-news/reston-association-news/alliance-of-reston-clusters-and-homeowners-meeting-on-77</link>
	<description>Reston Virginia’s Community Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:14:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: From the Uplands</title>
		<link>http://www.goreston.com/reston-news/reston-association-news/alliance-of-reston-clusters-and-homeowners-meeting-on-77/comment-page-1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>From the Uplands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goreston.com/?p=265#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Went to the meeting last night.  Very high signal to noise.  Robert Goudie did a good job as moderator.  Most questions went to RCC, but RA clarified several issues.

Large crowd very hostile to large cost of plan and loss of green space.  
RCC did good job explaining: 
a) Long lead time needed for planning infrastructure upgrades
b) Confident that planned population increase in Reston (post-Metro) can fund new rec. center 
c) RCC &amp; RA working together, not RCC and FC Parks and Rec 
d) Site planning is Lake Newport or Browns Chapel
e) Baron Cameron &amp; Lake Fairfax Parks, or North Government Center areas have &quot;issues&quot;
f) One detailed plan with max of 100 million in total costs over 20 years.
f1) Construction cost projected to be 50 million with free land provided by someone
g) No express desire for rec center from local businesses (pay 45% of SD 5 taxes)
h) More cost effective to have one big center
i) RCC wants a championship sized indoor pool, RA wants indoor tennis
j) Key to development direction is response to phone survey in Fall 09
k) Earliest bond (if needed) would be issued ~ winter 2011

RA added:
l) Value of land is approximately 4 million. ($2-2.5 / sq. ft. @ 12 acres) No assessment in hand
m) Only DRB approved structure is a covered tennis area at Lake Newport
n) Cost was $1.8 million in 2003.  Plan cancelled then due to high cost. 
0) even with approval from the residents via referendum, a planned building, and a bond issue to pay for $100 million, the DRB needs to approve design.

My note: DRB seems to be the unelected, uncontrollable ruler of what Reston becomes.  

As of today, no post on ARCH or RCC sites on meeting.

Good times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went to the meeting last night.  Very high signal to noise.  Robert Goudie did a good job as moderator.  Most questions went to RCC, but RA clarified several issues.</p>
<p>Large crowd very hostile to large cost of plan and loss of green space.<br />
RCC did good job explaining:<br />
a) Long lead time needed for planning infrastructure upgrades<br />
b) Confident that planned population increase in Reston (post-Metro) can fund new rec. center<br />
c) RCC &amp; RA working together, not RCC and FC Parks and Rec<br />
d) Site planning is Lake Newport or Browns Chapel<br />
e) Baron Cameron &amp; Lake Fairfax Parks, or North Government Center areas have &#8220;issues&#8221;<br />
f) One detailed plan with max of 100 million in total costs over 20 years.<br />
f1) Construction cost projected to be 50 million with free land provided by someone<br />
g) No express desire for rec center from local businesses (pay 45% of SD 5 taxes)<br />
h) More cost effective to have one big center<br />
i) RCC wants a championship sized indoor pool, RA wants indoor tennis<br />
j) Key to development direction is response to phone survey in Fall 09<br />
k) Earliest bond (if needed) would be issued ~ winter 2011</p>
<p>RA added:<br />
l) Value of land is approximately 4 million. ($2-2.5 / sq. ft. @ 12 acres) No assessment in hand<br />
m) Only DRB approved structure is a covered tennis area at Lake Newport<br />
n) Cost was $1.8 million in 2003.  Plan cancelled then due to high cost.<br />
0) even with approval from the residents via referendum, a planned building, and a bond issue to pay for $100 million, the DRB needs to approve design.</p>
<p>My note: DRB seems to be the unelected, uncontrollable ruler of what Reston becomes.  </p>
<p>As of today, no post on ARCH or RCC sites on meeting.</p>
<p>Good times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeR</title>
		<link>http://www.goreston.com/reston-news/reston-association-news/alliance-of-reston-clusters-and-homeowners-meeting-on-77/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goreston.com/?p=265#comment-64</guid>
		<description>RA and RCC have been provided ARCH questions to answer, and then questions will be opened to the floor. This should be a good forum, of the kind that ARCH has run in the past. Robert Goudie, a member of both sponsoring organizations - ARCH and WATCH - will moderate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RA and RCC have been provided ARCH questions to answer, and then questions will be opened to the floor. This should be a good forum, of the kind that ARCH has run in the past. Robert Goudie, a member of both sponsoring organizations &#8211; ARCH and WATCH &#8211; will moderate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
